A revisionist scholarly movement now challenges conventional Sartre-Beauvoir influence narratives

Evidence

By mentioning the works of Simons, Kruks, Bergoff en, and the Fullbrooks, we do not mean to give the impression that they have been the only scholars who have dealt with these issues. However, these scholars have initiated an important movement and line of inquiry that leads us to revise conventional views of Sartre’s and Beauvoir’s respective philosophies and their interrelations. — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre, 48

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Linking Beauvoir to Merleau-Ponty became a scholarly way to erase Sartre — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre: The Riddle of…, 62; Recent Beauvoir scholarship works by reversing influence direction and defending her concepts — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre: The Riddle of…, 163; Beauvoir scholarship’s one-way influence narrative is strategically motivated — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre: The Riddle of…, 164

Broader Connections

• Recent Beauvoir scholarship works by reversing influence direction and defending her concepts #exemplifies (0.90) — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre, 163
• Beauvoir scholarship’s one-way influence narrative is strategically motivated #exemplifies (0.82) — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre, 164