A repeating rise-and-fall life pattern reveals the Freudian compulsion to repeat.

Evidence

“It’s like a Greek tragedy. The only problem is that I’m the subject”, Mike Tyson reputedly told James Toback when he first saw this film. There is a classical structure to the narrative: a kid from mean streets, with few prospects, a life of criminality already under way, is talent-spotted by a grizzled boxing trainer; he becomes the youngest world champion ever; then it all disintegrates into hedonism, profligacy and violence. Yet in the end the structure of the story is psychoanalytic as much as tragic (after all, it wasn’t for nothing that Freud turned to Sophocles and Aeschylus for analogues of his discoveries). A familiar enough narrative arc, but what makes it even more remarkable (and even more Freudian) is that it happens again. Tyson struggles back to the top of the heavyweight game before once again succumbing to ill-discipline and self-destruction. A textbook case of the compulsion to repeat. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 585

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Clearly names and exemplifies ‘the compulsion to repeat’ as distinct from tragic structure.
  • XREF: Ties to earlier book claims about death-drive repetitions replacing conventional inner life in fiction (ch13). — connects to: Random affect-collages become necessary through repetition and desire — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished
, 130; The family is a hauntological structure of inherited repetition. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished
, 525; Repetition acts as the psyche’s default emergency homeostasis when pleasure alone cannot manage trauma — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain
, 4054 (+1 more)

Broader Connections