A nationalism’s territorial scope reflects the technological era of its birth

Evidence

In this sense, the ā€˜failure’ of the Spanish-American experience to generate a permanent Spanish-America-wide nationalism reflects both the general level of development of capitalism and technology in the late eighteenth century and the ā€˜local’ backwardness of Spanish capitalism and technology in relation to the administrative stretch of the empire. (The world-historical era in which each nationalism is born probably has a significant impact on its scope. Is Indian nationalism not inseparable from colonial administrative-market unification, after the Mutiny, by the most formidable and advanced of the imperial powers?) — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, 240

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the earlier chapters on print-capitalism and the newspaper’s imagined simultaneity constraining how far a nationalism can stretch.
  • QUESTION: The Indian nationalism parenthetical is a suggestive aside — worth chasing whether Indian nationalism’s all-India scope really traces to post-1857 administrative unification by a ā€˜formidable’ imperial power.